Wedding Without Vows
Modern times mount on social pressure to marry your partner. You know, you get talking to someone about your relationship and they often bring up something about hearing wedding bells or just ask, “So, you’ve been together for a while… are you going to get married soon?” And they give you this look like it’s a really personal, almost kinky kind of question. But why? Marriage isn’t something that is something that’s really personal — you do it in a crowd of people; and it makes no real impact on your relationship. So, really: what is it good for — absolutely nothin’.
The Wedding Hype Is Pointless:
First of all, one must ask themselves, what does a marriage give me. Is it more love? Is it the ability to have children? More time in the bedroom? Well, likely none of those, actually — most people who can’t have children usually aren’t miraculously ‘cured’ when they marry, most couples don’t care if they are married or not when it comes to sex, and if you need to preform a series of actions in order to feel more love in your relationship, then a romantic dinner is the way to go, not spending $30,000 (USD) on a wedding. So what does a wedding ultimately give one? A title. Congratulations, you are someone’s wife or husband. I must admit, though, it has a much better ring than “girlfriend” or “boyfriend” does. Not as nice as fiancee, though. Fiancee is extra nice because it’s unisex… but I have a feeling that you couldn’t get away with being fiancees your entire life. Also, some people may think better of your relationship if you’re married, so it could be a social status thing as well.
Secondly, one must ask themselves what a wedding is. Is it a presentation of your love before The Almighty, so that he might bless your union? Well, technically, yes, but these days, I think it’s mostly a glorified party with a religious twist, one which ends with signing some documents that say that you’re legally married and might be treated differently when it comes to the tax forms. However, a lot of weddings are literally there to be religious unions before God. On the other hand, I think that God mostly cares about the love that two people share, the love that unites them, and no so much the traditional ceremony that is used to advertise that fact. (But, like I’ve said before: I’m not God, and, as a mortal, I can’t ever be sure what God believes, feels, thinks, or even if God is capable of these things.)
Thirdly: yes a wedding is traditionally about the holy union, but let’s face the fact that these days, religion is not much of a factor in a lot of peoples’ lives. The world is becoming too diverse and communication is becoming too borderless and quick for most people to be dead-set in any belief system. For example, having children in an unmarried state no longer makes the child a social outcast, and the world ‘bastard’ has almost lost all of its traditional meaning. I have not met anyone that I know will think ill of a person because they were born outside of wedlock. As another proof, civil unions are rapidly becoming more popular as people are being outcast from their religions because of their sexual orientation (which they really can’t do anything about). Christianity in general doesn’t like homosexuals, and a lot of churches and governments do not allow them to marry. Because homosexuals often want to marry, but often can’t in a religious way, civil unions are the only path (if they are allowed in the country). By the way, homosexuals in North America make up roughly 2-5% of the population. Statistics vary, often in that range. The 10% statistic that has often been quoted has been found as flawed, however.
Also curious: in the western world, our wedding traditions are viewed as, “the only way.” Often in a church, with a priest, in a white dress and black suit, etc. This is ridiculous because the white dress thing only became a standard once a queen (Victoria) wore a white dress to symbolize her purity, and this has nothing to do with the religious side of things. Also, in more ancient times, there were a variety of traditions that had been done, including handfasting (which is still sometimes done today), and being married outside (often on hills). More so, in some parts of Asia, white is a colour of mourning, and in a lot of the eastern world, red is the colour for weddings.
Finally, we must remember that in modern times, marriage holds far less weight than it once did. Divorce is quite common today, with percentages as high as 40 - 50%. Therefore, as bad as it sounds, marriage often becomes just a complication when attempting to back out of a relationship. If people are wanting to break up in modern times, they are going to break up. Marriage just makes it more difficult, painful, and annoying for them to do so.
Love Is Pointed (As In Not Pointless):
First of all, one has to ask one’s self: am I happy with my partner and our current life arrangement? Will a marriage change anything for the better? If no, then why does one need to marry? (I suggest my article on avoiding the desire for advancement when you are already happy: In Joyous Loss.) If things are going well, then why attempt any kind of change or action?
Secondly, one should avoid being caught up in the planning, celebrating, and traditions attached to a wedding — it’s all “fluff,” after all. Traditions are generally pointless altogether. They are basically things that a person feels obligated to do without a really strong reason to benefit to themselves. Remember the important key: a wedding is about love, and more importantly, so is a serious relationship. A marriage gives you a title, but it is an empty one if you do not love the person that you are with.
So, don’t rush into getting married, be happy with your relationship as it is, and be loving and caring. If you want to “make it official” later, then do it, but remember that what really counts is the foundation, not the crystal angel on the top. It takes years to build a very successful relationship, but only a day to marry. And after all, what changes after a wedding?
Stub/Summary: “Wedding Witout Vows — weddings are pointless because of modern times and lack of religion or change after the fact. Love and caring are the truely important things in a relationship.”

August 2nd, 2006 at 4:16 am
This piece is so cynical, that I’m not surprised that Bill Maher never made a cameo.
Anywho, my view is that weddings are a security blanket for the couple (however moreso for the women). It tries to shut off any possible chance of one of the mates bonding with someone else.
Notice in modern films, that in tragic wedding sequences that if the prince falls in love with the enchanting beauty but is contractually obligated to marry the evil witch character, he must make the daring procalmation of true love before the wedding, otherwise there won’t be a happy ending.
Ya see kids, marriage is a way for women to tie down their biological partners. And no, I’m not that sexist. I do have proof.
Ahem…
Ya see, a man’s primal urge, when it comes to breeding, is to spread his seeds with as many partners as physically possible in order to increase the odds of his genes passing onto the next generation.
A female’s primal urge is to take one partner, and continuously fornicate with that one client, for her best odds of getting pregnant are attained by continous humping of one single specimen repeatedly.
So this is why men are so sleazy when it comes to procreation, by sleeping with as many women as possible his seeds will be sown across the entire field and his chances of having a successful swimmer reaching the 100 meter mark are increased with very lake they must traverse (to put it so bluntly).
It is also notable that with each act of intercource, the odds of conception are 3% (based primarily on the lunar clock of the female, and less on the swimmer’s gold medal performances).
So there is one highly sexist arguement over the purposes of marriage.
I guess I really shouldn’t be complaining when it comes to cynicism.
If you think I’m wrong, umm…
Reply and please don’t hate, appreciate.
(Note: This arguement is not necessarily mine, but one that was proposed to me by another some time ago. So don’t make character assassinations abour beliefs that may or may not be mine. THANK YOU SEATTLE! WE LOVE YOU!)
August 2nd, 2006 at 4:17 am
Weddings are also a symbol of others of the level of your commitment to your spouce. If people she a visual standard sign of commitment (aka the ring) then they will take the relationship with a higher seriousness.
March 30th, 2007 at 8:25 pm
I agree that weddings have gotten over the top, but your rant on the institution of marriage screams “I have committment problems, stop asking me why I’m not married!”
It’s one thing when a guy says, “Yeah baby, I love you, I don’t want to date anyone else.” But wouldn’t you think it were weird if he said that were the case yet refused to hold hands with you in public? Acknowledge that he is in a relationship on Mypace (How utterly modern.) If you tell your partner “Yes, I will be here for you while we raise our children and when we finish, I will be there for you when you are old and gray,” that’s fabulous. But telling saying it in front of God, clergy/legal authority, family, and friends, makes it more real. You no longer have to live up to the promises you said in private. Now you have to live up to the promise you made in front of the whole world, and if you fail, it’s a million time more public.
Scared? Frightened at the idea? You should be, it’s a serious step. But don’t pull this “marriage is outdated” crap. Just be honest about your issues.
October 5th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Best Wedding Ideas…
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting…